In the case of Microsoft, Intel and AMD: they get enough oversight from tech working groups, white-hat hackers and etc. So to me it's not so much that these things are built-in as how readily they may be subverted for nefarious purposes. Point being: these firms not only have a HUGE financial interest in doing what they do right but they already get a massive amount of oversight by the technology working groups where much of their work is reviewed and discussed in order for it (and everyone else) to be standards compliant. AMD is too, maybe to a lesser extent but they have to be part of the extreme low-level security measures (watch-dog processors, TPM's) increasingly necessary for them to be effective on their systems. That certainly got a lot of attention with the launch of Win10, but seems to have died down now.īut there is a difference, mainly that Microsoft and Intel (WinTel) are (IBM aside) pretty much the inventor of the PC and still at the very top of the tech train that drives it's future development, especially important where it concerns security and privacy. This is the last Asus board I'll ever buy, to be sure.Īnd then there's Windows10/11's constant telemetry stream back to the developers. These problems in addition to a couple other annoying cheap-outs (no VRM temp sensor report, no DIMM voltage sensor report) make this up-market priced board a bad deal. All I use are the audio drivers I'd get them direct from Realtek except Asus uses a propietary variant of the codec chip so I can't. Available are AMD chipset, audio, LAN, RAID and maybe some others. I do get motherboard drivers by direct download from the motherboard's support site. I'm certainly not going to take any chances by putting myself through all that again to test it out though. I'd like to think the signed WHQL requirements Microsoft is imposing ever more strictly would rectify the blind installing, lack of bundled uninstaller and incomplete uninstallation. If you ever reset CMOS or update BIOS you have to be VERY DILIGENT and disable that BIOS option at first restart or you go through it all over again if the system's connected to the internet.Įven if you take issue with calling it a root-kit, mainly because it's not exactly nefarious, it's definitely a back-door into your system that Asus plants without your knowledge and without your opt-in. Even then the services do not get removed, you have to find them and then use another Windows command line administrative tool - SC, System Control Manager - to delete them. And yes, there is a BIOS option to disable the download and install, but you have to know ahead of time to disable it or at first boot into Windows it will download and install the services.īut lets add more to the root-kit aspect of this thing: You have to go looking for another Asus application to un-install it as they don't include un-installers with the distribution. But frankly I don't care, this is not what the question is about.)Ĭan't say for 700 chipset boards but I have an Asus TUF B550m Gaming Plus and I can definitely say it has the same Armoury Crate auto-install rootkit. (If you think Armoury Crate is a great tool, good, more power to you. b) Are there manufacturers that don't do this? a) Are all 700 chipset Asus boards affected?ģ. Is this only Asus, or do other board manufacturers embed similar artificial vulnerabilities to push their bloatware?ģ. (Rethorical) How the hell is the PC building community not foaming in the mouth?ģ. I didn't want to believe this, but a quick search yielded some results where people complained that after clean Windows install on an Asus laptop, some bloatware just magically installs itself, circumventing all OS-level restrictive measures by the user.īeyond how freaking annoying and invasive this is, this is also a huge vulnerability that I'm not willing to buy into.ġ. He mentioned that ASUS installs, on the freaking board, practically a rootkit that installs Armory Crate on your system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |